[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Contralateral Breast

M. Akram, K. Iqbal, M. Isa, M. Afzal, Dr. S.a. Buzdar,
Volume 12, Issue 4 (10-2014)
Abstract

Background: It was intended to investigate the effect of physical wedge (PW) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW) on contralateral breast dose during primary breast irradiation in radiotherapy treatment, using high energy photon beams. Materials and Methods: The Varian’s Clinac dual mode linear accelerator model 2100 C/D and Siemen’s Primus accelerators were used for radiation doses with 6 MV and 15 MV. Doses were delivered using Tangential field techniques and asymmetric collimator jaws. Eclipse three-dimensional Treatment Planning System (3DTPS) was used to measure contralateral breast dose for all fiend settings. Sixty five patients (with cancerous breast as well as chest wall) were taken and their contralateral breast doses were measured at a point 5 cm across, at 2 cm depth from the end of the medial field. Results: The contralateral breast dose mean difference was 0.25 cGy and 0.24 cGy during the comparison of PW and EDW on Varian’s Clinac and 0.19 cGy and 0.18 cGy were found for medial EDW and without medial EDW for the same machine in breast cases and chest wall cases respectively as per total prescribed dose. The mean difference for PW (Clinac) and PW (Primus) was found 0.08 cGy and 0.31 cGy and during the comparison of medial PW and without medial PW on primus machine this mean difference was 0.25 cGy and 0.51 cGy in breast cases and chest wall cases respectively as per total prescribed dose. Conclusion: The investigation demonstrates the significance that the EDW produces less scattered dose, which can cause second breast malignancy, compared to PW. Furthermore, the medial wedge, too, can cause second breast malignancy and should be avoided in planning.


Dr. F. Bouzarjomehri, M. Rezaie Yazdi,
Volume 15, Issue 3 (7-2017)
Abstract

Background: The radiation dose received by contralateral breast (CLB) is one of the concerns of breast radiotherapy, because it may lead to the induction of secondary breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CLB surface dose in the breast treatment in Yazd radiotherapy center. Materials and Methods: The surface dose of CLB was measured using TLD dosimetry in 50 cancer breast patients. The TLD chips were placed at four points on the each of CLBs. The patients were treated by 6MV photon beams of Oncor (physical wedge) and Compact (motorized wedge) LINAC. The TLD chips were placed on the surfaces of CLB during the medial and lateral tangent radiation fields in one of radiotherapy fractions. Results: The mean percent of prescription dose of the CLB surface doses on the point 1 in the two Linac (Oncor & Compact) were significantly different. The mean of CLB surface doses of point 1 in the physical and the motorized wedge techniques were 5.78 and 7.84 percent of prescription dose of breast cancer, respectively. The medial and lateral fields' contribution from 7.4% surface dose of CLB were 5.8% and 1.6%, respectively. Conclusion: In Shahid Ramezanzadeh radiotherapy center, the CLB surface dose due to breast cancer radiotherapy by the Compact machine (7.84 %) was significantly more than the allowable value (6% prescription dose). The CLB does due to the medial field beam was more than the lateral field.
 


Page 1 from 1     

International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4700