<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1384</year>
	<month>12</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2006</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>3</volume>
<number>4</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Conventional and spiral CT dose indices in Yazd general hospitals, Iran</title>
	<subject_fa>Radiation Biology</subject_fa>
	<subject>Radiation Biology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;  ABSTRACT &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Background: &lt;/strong&gt;While the benefits of Computed Tomography (CT) are well known in accurate diagnosis, those benefits are not risk free. CT is a device with higher patient dose in comparison with other conventional radiological procedures. Is the reduction of exposures by requiring optimization of CT procedures [a principle concern in radiological protection]? In this study, the radiation dose of conventional and spiral CT were investigated and compared with European Commission Reference Dose Levels (EC RDLs). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Materials and Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The dosimetric quantities proposed in the European Guidelines (EG) for CT are Weighted Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI&lt;sub&gt;W&lt;/sub&gt;) for a single slice for axial scanning or per rotation for helical scanning and Dose-Length Product (DLP) for a complete examination. The patient-related data were collected for brain, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis examination s in each scanner. For each type of examination, 10 typical patients were randomly included. CTDI with an active length of 10cm was measured in two CT scanners by using UNFORS (Mult-O-Meter 601) in head and body phantom (PMMA) with 16 cm and 32 cm in diameter respectively. Mean values of CTDI&lt;sub&gt;W&lt;/sub&gt; , DLP and Effective Dose(ED) were estimated for those examinations . &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Results: &lt;/strong&gt;CTDI&lt;sub&gt;W&lt;/sub&gt; had a range of 15.8-24.7 mGy for brain, 16.1-30.6mGy for neck, 6.8-9.2 mGy for chest, 6.8-9.8 mGy for abdomen and pelvis. DLP had a range of 246.4-397.7 mGy.cm for brain, 104.6-262.2 mGy.cm for neck, 135-248.4 mGy.cm for chest, 187-298.9 mGy.cm for abdomen and 197.2-319.4 mGy.cm for pelvis. The mean values of effective dose were 0.74 mSv for brain, 0.9 mSv for neck, 3.1 mSv for chest, 3.7 mSv for abdomen and 5 mSv for pelvis. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;The obtained results in this study have shown that CTDI&lt;sub&gt;W&lt;/sub&gt; and DLP are lower than EC RDLs and other studies, in other words , the performance of all scanners has been satisfactory as far as CTDIw and DLP are concerned. The CTDI&lt;sub&gt;W&lt;/sub&gt; and DLP in the conventional CT are higher than the spiral CT values . With regard to ALARA principle, for the establishment of reference dose levels, the radiation dose with spiral CT scanners should be taken into account. &lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>,CTDIw,patient dose,CT, DLP,RDLs</keyword>
	<start_page>183</start_page>
	<end_page>189</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-175&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name></first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>F. Bouzarjomehri</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>Bouzarj_44@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>79003194753284600482</code>
	<orcid>79003194753284600482</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name></first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>M. H. Zare</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>79003194753284600483</code>
	<orcid>79003194753284600483</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name></first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>D. Shahbazi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>79003194753284600484</code>
	<orcid>79003194753284600484</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
