<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1399</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2020</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>18</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Radiobiological comparison of 3D conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of left-sided breast cancer</title>
	<subject_fa>Medical Physics</subject_fa>
	<subject>Medical Physics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Background: The current study aimed to compare the tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for left-sided breast cancer using radiobiological models. Methods: This study was conducted on 30 patients with left-sided breast cancer, who&amp;nbsp;were planned for 3D-CRT and 6-9 fields IMRT treatments using the PROWESS treatment planning system.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The planning target volume (PTV) dose of 50 Gy was administered for the 3D-CRT and IMRT plans, respectively.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The Niemierko&amp;rsquo;s equivalent uniform dose (EUD) model was utilized for the estimation of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).&amp;nbsp;Results: According to the results, the mean TCP values for 3D-CRT, 6-fields IMRT, and 9-fields IMRT plans were 99.07 &amp;plusmn;0.07, 99.24 &amp;plusmn;0.05 and 99.28 &amp;plusmn;0.04, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference. The NTCPs of the&amp;nbsp;lung and heart were considerably lower in the IMRT plans, compared to those in the 3D-CRT plans.&lt;/div&gt;
Conclusions: From the radiobiological point of view, our results indicated that 3D-CRT produces a lower NTCP for ipsilateral lung. In contrast, for TCP calculations, there was a higher gain with IMRT plans compared to 3D-CRT plans.</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Radiobiological evaluation, left-sided breast cancer, three dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy.</keyword>
	<start_page>315</start_page>
	<end_page>322</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2055-16&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>A. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Shanei</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460015820</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460015820</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Faculty Member of Medical Physics Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>A. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Amouheidari</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460015821</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460015821</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Radiation Oncologist, Isfahan Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>I. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Abedi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>i.abedi@med.mui.ac.ir</email>
	<code>7900319475328460015822</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460015822</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Faculty Member of Medical Physics Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>A. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Kazemzadeh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460015823</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460015823</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Medical Physics, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>A. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Jaafari</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460015824</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460015824</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Medical Physics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
