<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1400</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2021</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>19</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Dosimetric comparison of three different radiotherapy techniques (3DCRT, ECOMP &amp; VMAT)for breast irradiation</title>
	<subject_fa>Medical Physics</subject_fa>
	<subject>Medical Physics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Background: The aim of this study was to&amp;nbsp;compare&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;treatment&amp;nbsp;plans of three techniques namely three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), Electronic tissue compensator (ECOMP) based planning and Volumetric Modulated&amp;nbsp;Arc Therapy (VMAT). Material and Methods: The&amp;nbsp;planning goal&amp;nbsp;was set to cover 95% of the planning target volume with 95% prescription dose for the dose plan of 40 Gy in 16 fractions.&amp;nbsp;Treatment techniques with improved dose homogeneity, optimum skin dose, lung dose (V&lt;sub&gt;20Gy&lt;/sub&gt;) and contralateral breast dose were used as the criteria to select the optimized treatment plan.&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;treatment&amp;nbsp;planning time and the number of monitor units (MU) required to execute the plan were also taken into consideration.&amp;nbsp;Result:&amp;nbsp;PTV coverage (V&lt;sub&gt;95%&lt;/sub&gt;) for the patient of ca-right breast and the ca-left breast was superior in VMAT plans. Ipsilateral&amp;nbsp;lung (V&lt;sub&gt;5Gy&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;%) showed significant dose reduction in ECOMP plans compared to 3DCRT and VMAT plans. Similarly, for the heart and&amp;nbsp;contralateral lung, the mean doses were least in ECOMP plans. Dose homogeneity Index (HI) and Dose conformity Index (CI) was better in ECOMP plans compared to 3DCRT, but VMAT plans&amp;nbsp;were&amp;nbsp;superior to both the other techniques. The skin surface dose was less in VMAT plan.&amp;nbsp;Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;VMAT has high CI as well as HI but at the cost of higher OAR doses (lung and heart) and large treatment planning time. For a busy center, ECOMP can be a good choice of treatment technique which can optimize the OAR doses and treatment planning time but for dose homogeneity and conformity, VMAT is superior to others.&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Electronic tissue compensator, volumetric modulated arc therapy, three -dimensional conformal radiotherapy, homogeneity index, conformity index.</keyword>
	<start_page>371</start_page>
	<end_page>379</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2188-7&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>G. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Trivedi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>gauravtrivedi25@gmail.com</email>
	<code>7900319475328460020115</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460020115</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>A.S. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Oinam</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460020116</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460020116</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>B. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Singh Yadav</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460020117</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460020117</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>T. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Vasudeva</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460020118</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460020118</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
