<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1402</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2023</year>
	<month>7</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>21</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Effects of high-resolution measurements between different multi-row detectors on volumetric modulated arc therapy patient-specific quality assurance </title>
	<subject_fa>Radiation Biology</subject_fa>
	<subject>Radiation Biology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:newspaper&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida-space:50%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:119%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;Background&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;This study aimed to evaluate the optimal criteria and conditions in which single-measurement (SM) and high-resolution measurement (HM) provide a similar evaluation accuracy for ArcCHECK (AC) and Octavius (OT) detectors. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;Materials and Methods&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt; In the SM and HM for AC and OT, we evaluated &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;el&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:el&quot;&gt;&amp;gamma;-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;analysis pass-rate differences for various conditions (criteria, calculation grid size, and shift of the isocenter) of 20 patients who received volumetric modulated arc therapy. All results of the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;el&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:el&quot;&gt;&amp;gamma;-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;analysis pass rate were analyzed using the Anderson&amp;ndash;Darling normality test. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;Results&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;In the AC detector, an SM with a 1%/1 mm criterion, 1.25 mm calculation grid size, and two standard deviations (2SD) of tolerance showed an evaluation accuracy similar to that of an HM. In the OT detector, an SM with a 2%/2 mm criterion, 2.0 mm calculation grid, and 2SD of tolerance had an evaluation accuracy similar to that of an HM. The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;el&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:el&quot;&gt;&amp;gamma;-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;pass-rate data of the OT detector for the 3%/3 mm criterion did not follow a normal distribution in both SM and HM. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;Conclusions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;Most high &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;el&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:el&quot;&gt;&amp;gamma;-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;analysis pass rates achieved using inadequate criteria may not detect errors; therefore, accurate evaluation is necessary for optimizing the criteria settings of individual QA devices based on the characteristics and the uncertainties of array detectors. The characteristics of a detector array can be enhanced by evaluating the relationship between SM and HM, which reduces the workload of patient-specific QA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Patient-specific QA, volumetric modulated arc therapy, single measurement, high-resolution measurement, radiation treatment planning system.</keyword>
	<start_page>413</start_page>
	<end_page>419</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-1060&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Y. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Kunii</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460024133</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460024133</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Y. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Tanabe</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>tanabey@okayama-u.ac.jp </email>
	<code>7900319475328460024134</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460024134</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Shikata, Kita, Okayama, Japan</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>A. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Higashi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460024135</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460024135</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>A. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Nakamoto</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460024136</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460024136</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>K. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Nishioka</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460024137</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460024137</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
