[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 22, Issue 2 (4-2024) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2024, 22(2): 355-360 Back to browse issues page
Usability of bowtie filter full-fan mode over half-fan mode in cone-beam computed tomography scanning - A prospective study
W.K. Choi , W. Park , S. Kim
, ksc@gachon.ac.kr
Abstract:   (521 Views)
Background: Using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiotherapy, the thorax or pelvis, which are both large areas, can be scanned by rotating the gantry 360° using a half-fan (HF) bowtie filter (BF). The HF mode has a longer scan time than that of the full-fan (FF) mode, thus exposing the patient to an increased imaging dose. Materials and Methods: To determine the applicability of FF to anatomically large areas, positioning error values and absorbed dose of organs at risk (OARs) were measured when HF and FF were employed in 22 patients who underwent pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Results: In a clinical experiment applying FFBF scan mode to anatomically large areas of a patient’s body during CBCT, the positioning error values were measured for all target areas within the mean ± 3 mm in all three directions. The scanning time in the FF scan mode was reduced by 20 s, while the absorption dose was reduced by 7–52 times in the OARs. Conclusion: The appropriate application of FF for treating large-size targets can reduce the CBCT scanning time, which, in turn, would markedly decrease the radiation exposure in patients by reducing random errors during procedures.
Keywords: Bowtie filter, Full-fan, Half-fan, Positioning error values.
Full-Text [PDF 825 kb]   (178 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. Won YJ, Kim JW, Kim JH (2017) Dose comparison using deformed image registration method on breast cancer radiotherapy. J Radiological Science and Technology, 40(1): 57-62. [DOI:10.17946/JRST.2017.40.1.09]
2. Zhang J, Bao ZR, Huang XT, et al. (2019) Methods to evaluate the performance of kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography in three-dimensional reconstruction space. Int J Radiat Res, 17(2): 189-202.
3. Jaffray DA and Siewerdsen JH (2000) Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Med Phys, 27(6): 1311-23. [DOI:10.1118/1.599009]
4. Hansen EK, Bucci MK, Quivey JM, et al. (2006) Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 64(2): 355-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.957]
5. Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD, et al. (2006) Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys, 33(6):1573-82. [DOI:10.1118/1.2198169]
6. Kim JH and Bae SH (2017) The effect of patient positioning system on the prescription dose in radiation therapy. J Radiological Science and Technology, 40(4): 613-20. [DOI:10.17946/JRST.2017.40.4.11]
7. Siewerdsen JH and Jaffray DA (2001) Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of X-ray scatter. Med Phys, 28(2): 220-31. [DOI:10.1118/1.1339879]
8. Kumar AS, Singh RR, Sharma SD, et al. (2016) Radiation dose measurements during kilovoltage-cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther, 12(2): 858-63. [DOI:10.4103/0973-1482.164699]
9. Kim S, Sua Y, Yin F, et al. (2010) Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols. Med Phys, 37(7): 3648-59. [DOI:10.1118/1.3438478]
10. Li Y, Netherton T, Nitsch PL, et al. (2018) Normal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using orthogonal MV and MV-CBCT. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 19(3): 52-7. [DOI:10.1002/acm2.12276]
11. Malajovich I, Teo BK, Petroccia H, et al. (2019) Characterization of the megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MV-CBCT) system on HalcyonTM for IGRT: image quality benchmark, clinical performance, and organ doses. Front Oncol, 9: 496. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2019.00496]
12. Seet KY, Barghi A, Yartsev S, Dyk JV (2009) The effects of field-of-view and patient size on CT numbers from cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol, 54(20): 6251-62. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/54/20/014]
13. Kim S and Alaei P (2016) Implementation of full/half bowtie filter models in a commercial treatment planning system for kilovoltage cone-beam CT dose estimations. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 17(2): 153-64. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5988]
14. Choi W, Park W, Kim S (2021) Usability assessment of cone-beam computed tomography with a full-fan mode bowtie filter compared with that with a half-fan mode bowtie filter. Int J Radiat Res, 19(1): 231-37. [DOI:10.29252/ijrr.19.1.231]
15. Cheng HC, Wu VW, Liu ES, Kwong DL (2011) Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 80(1): 291-300. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.014]
16. Hyde D, Lochray F, Korol R, et al. (2012) Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizing cone-beam CT image-guidance with a robotic couch: intrafraction motion analysis accounting for all six degrees of freedom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 82(3): e555-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1980]
17. Scarfe WC and Farman AG (2008) What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am, 52(4): 707-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005]
18. Lin CG, Xu SK, Yao WY, et al. (2017) Comparison of setup accuracy among three common immobilization systems for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Med Radiat Sci, 64(2): 106-13. [DOI:10.1002/jmrs.189]
19. Varian Medical Systems Inc. The reference guide provided information and procedures for using the onboard imager application, version 1.4. 2007.
20. Sykes JR, Amer A, Czajka J, Moore C (2005) A feasibility study for image-guided radiotherapy using low-dose, high-speed, cone-beam X-ray volumetric imaging. Radiother Oncol, 77(1): 45-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.05.005]
21. Ding GX, Munro P, Pawlowski P, et al. (2010) Reducing radiation exposure to patients from kV-CBCT imaging. Radiother Oncol, 97(3): 585-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.005]
22. Alvarado R, Booth JT, Bromley RM, Gustafsson HB (2013) An investigation of image guidance dose for breast radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 14(3): 25-38. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4085]
23. Niu T and Zhu L (2011) Scatter correction for full-fan volumetric CT using a stationary beam blocker in a single full scan. Med Phys, 38(11): 6027-38. [DOI:10.1118/1.3651619]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Choi W, Park W, Kim S. Usability of bowtie filter full-fan mode over half-fan mode in cone-beam computed tomography scanning - A prospective study. Int J Radiat Res 2024; 22 (2) :355-360
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-5432-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 2 (4-2024) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660