[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 23, Issue 1 (1-2025) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2025, 23(1): 61-68 Back to browse issues page
Clinical analysis of gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas
J. Shan , Y. Wen , Y. Guo
Special Examination Department, Shandong Daizhuang Hospital, JiNing City, Shandong, China , Shanaaa0410@163.com
Abstract:   (393 Views)
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 123 patients with pituitary adenomas who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery at Shandong Daizhuang hospital. All patients were followed up for 12 months post-treatment and complete follow-up data were obtained. Follow-up data included records of disease progression (medical history and physical examination changes), imaging and endocrine follow-up results at re-examination. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors affecting tumor control and post-treatment complications, and factors with statistical significance (P <0.05) were subjected to multivariate analysis. Results: Clinical data of 123 patients with pituitary adenomas were included in this study, with 51 patients in the postoperative group who had previously undergone surgical treatment, and 72 patients who were treated first with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Except for age, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. Tumor volume [P=0.034, odds ratio (OR)=1.071, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.121-5.206] and tumor invasion (P=0.005, OR=0.233, 95% CI: 0.202-0.392) were predictive factors for tumor progression. The results of the 1-year follow-up showed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between patients with pituitary adenomas who had previously undergone surgical treatment and those who were first treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Conclusion: Gamma Knife radiosurgery is an effective treatment option for patients with pituitary adenomas, regardless of whether they have previously undergone surgical treatment.
Keywords: Gamma Knife, radiosurgery, pituitary adenoma, risk factors, regression analysis.
Full-Text [PDF 652 kb]   (72 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. 1. Nguyen MT and Lavi E (2015) Pituitary adenoma-neuronal choristoma is a pituitary adenoma with ganglionic differentiation. Exp Mol Pathol, 99(3): 628-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.11.004]
2. Feigl GC, Pistracher K, Berghold A, et al. (2010) Pituitary insufficiency as a side effect after radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: the role of the hypothalamus. J Neurosurg, 113 Suppl: 153-59. [DOI:10.3171/2010.8.GKS10959]
3. Tsukamoto T and Miki Y (2023) Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma. Jpn J Radiol, 41(8): 789-806. [DOI:10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7]
4. Karavitaki N (2012) Prevalence and incidence of pituitary adenomas. Ann Endocrinol (Paris), 73(2): 79-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.ando.2012.03.039]
5. Yamanaka R, Abe E, Sato T, et al. (2017) Secondary intracranial tumors following radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: A systematic review. Cancers (Basel), 9(8): 103. [DOI:10.3390/cancers9080103]
6. Ogra S, Nichols AD, Stylli S, et al. (2014) Visual acuity and pattern of visual field loss at presentation in pituitary adenoma. J Clin Neurosci, 21(5): 735-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.01.005]
7. Pereira-Neto A, Borba AM, Mello PA, et al. (2010) Mean intrasellar pressure, visual field, headache intensity and quality of life of patients with pituitary adenoma. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 68(3): 350-4. [DOI:10.1590/S0004-282X2010000300004]
8. Simander G, Eriksson PO, Lindvall P, et al. (2022) Intrasellar pressure in patients with pituitary adenoma - relation to tumour size and growth pattern. BMC Neurol, 22(1): 82. [DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02601-9]
9. Yavropoulou MP, Tsoli M, Barkas K, et al. (2020) The natural history and treatment of non-functioning pituitary adenomas (non-functioning PitNETs). Endocr Relat Cancer, 27(10): R375-r390. [DOI:10.1530/ERC-20-0136]
10. Jha S and Kumar S (2009) TSH secreting pituitary adenoma. J Assoc Physicians India, 57: 537-9.
11. Cossu G, Daniel RT, Pierzchala K, et al. (2019) Thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and management. Pituitary, 22(1): 79-88. [DOI:10.1007/s11102-018-0921-3]
12. Sathyakumar R, Chacko G (2020) Newer concepts in the classification of pituitary adenomas. Neurol India, 68(Suppl): S7-s12. [DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.287667]
13. Mooney MA, Hardesty DA, Sheehy JP, et al. (2017) Rater Reliability of the Hardy Classification for Pituitary Adenomas in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Era. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 78(5): 413-8. [DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1603649]
14. Li P, Zhang D, Ma S, et al. (2021) Consistency of pituitary adenomas: Amounts of collagen types I and III and the predictive value of T2WI MRI. Exp Ther Med, 22(5): 1255. [DOI:10.3892/etm.2021.10690]
15. Kim EH, Oh MC, Chang JH, et al. (2018) Postoperative Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Cavernous Sinus-Invading Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas. World Neurosurg, 110: e534-e45. [DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.043]
16. Elson A, Bovi J, Kaur K, et al. (2014) Effect of treatment modality on the hypothalamic-pituitary function of patients treated with radiation therapy for pituitary adenomas: hypothalamic dose and endocrine outcomes. Front Oncol, 4: 73. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2014.00073]
17. Astafyeva LI, Kadashev BA, Sidneva YG, et al. (2020) Pituitary microadenomas - current diagnostic and treatment methods. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko, 84(2): 110-20. [DOI:10.17116/neiro202084021110]
18. Iida H, Komagata T, Tanaka H, et al. (2021) Novel platform for predicting drug effects in patients with acromegaly: Translational exposure-response evaluation of growth hormone-inhibitory effect of octreotide after growth hormone-releasing hormone stimulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 379(3): 400-8. [DOI:10.1124/jpet.121.000769]
19. Chen J, Liu H, Man S, et al. (2021) Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for the treatment of pituitary adenoma: A meta-analysis. Front Surg, 8: 806855. [DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.806855]
20. Loeffler JS and Shih HA (2011) Radiation therapy in the management of pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 96(7): 1992-2003. [DOI:10.1210/jc.2011-0251]
21. Lee JH, Kim IY, Jung S, et al. (2023) Two-day fraction Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large brain metastasis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 67(5): 560-567. [DOI:10.3340/jkns.2023.0214]
22. Wang XF, Zhang S, Ye YH, et al. (2012) Clinicopathologic features of delayed radiation-induced brain injury after radiotherapy for brain tumor. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi, 41(4): 224-8.
23. Mooney MA, Hardesty DA, Sheehy JP, et al. (2017) Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Knosp scale for pituitary adenoma grading. J Neurosurg, 126(5): 1714-9. [DOI:10.3171/2016.3.JNS153044]
24. Li P, Ren HB, Zhang ZJ, et al. (2013) [Control of tumor with gamma knife in patients with pituitary adenomas]. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 44(3): 458-61.
25. Kandregula S and Guthikonda B (2023) Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Neurol India, 71(Suppl): S1. [DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.373629]
26. Tripathi M, Jani P, Bhatta R, et al. (2023) Development, Validation, and Impact of Patient Information Booklet for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. Neurol India, 71(Suppl): S224-s9. [DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.373624]
27. Honegger J, Nasi-Kordhishti I, Giese S (2019) Pituitary adenomas. Nervenarzt, 90(6): 568-77. [DOI:10.1007/s00115-019-0708-4]
28. Brummelman P, Elderson MF, Dullaart RP, et al. (2011) Cognitive functioning in patients treated for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma and the effects of pituitary radiotherapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 74(4): 481-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03947.x]
29. Sanmillán JL, Torres-Diaz A, Sanchez-Fernández JJ, et al. (2017) Radiologic predictors for extent of resection in pituitary adenoma surgery. A single-center study. World Neurosurg, 108: 436-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.017]
30. Zhang Y (2020) Risk factor analysis of postoperative recurrence of pituitary adenomas and experimental study of PVT1 in the progression of pituitary adenomas Ph.D., Chinese People's Liberation Army Medical University, China.
31. Bălinişteanu B, Cîmpean AM, Ceauşu AR, et al. (2017) High Ki-67 expression is associated with prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas. Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 17(2): 104-8. [DOI:10.17305/bjbms.2017.1750]
32. Zhang Y, Chen C, Tian Z, et al. (2019) Differentiation of pituitary adenoma from rathke cleft cyst: Combining MR image features with texture features. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2019: 6584636. [DOI:10.1155/2019/6584636]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shan J, Wen Y, Guo Y. Clinical analysis of gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Int J Radiat Res 2025; 23 (1) :61-68
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-5946-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 1 (1-2025) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.11 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4704