Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China , jcp880108@163.com
Abstract: (173 Views)
Background:To explore the feasibility of using various ultra-low contrast flow rates on the coronary CTA (CCTA) when the tube voltage is set at 80KV automatically on 3rd-generation dual-source CT. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 patients with suspected coronary atherosclerotic disease were randomly divided into two groups, each subdivided into seven BMI-based subgroups (≤ 25, 25-26, 26-27, 27-28, 28-29, 29-30, > 30). The experimental group (A) used individualized injection rates (2.8-3.4 ml/s) with 350 mg I/ml contrast agent based on BMI, with a fixed injection time of 10s. The control group (B) used a fixed injection rate of 4.0 ml/s and a fixed injection time of 12s. Both groups employed prospective ECG-gated scanning. Image quality, effective radiation dose, and contrast agent dosage were compared using the Student's t-test. Results: In Group B, the coronary artery CT value exceeded the optimal diagnostic range (300-450 HU) recommended by experts. Group A had significantly lower CT values, SNR, and CNR compared to Group B (P < 0.05), but the enhancement in Group A was closer to the optimal diagnostic range. There was no significant difference in subjective image scores between the groups (P > 0.05), with consistent scoring between two directors (ICC: 0.612-0.852). Both groups had similar effective doses (P > 0.05). The contrast agent dosage in Group A was significantly lower than in Group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The optimized contrast injection scheme can significantly reduce the amount of contrast agent and obtain better image quality.
Background:To explore the feasibility of using various ultra-low contrast flow rates on the coronary CTA (CCTA) when the tube voltage is set at 80KV automatically on 3rd-generation dual-source CT. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 patients with suspected coronary atherosclerotic disease were randomly divided into two groups, each subdivided into seven BMI-based subgroups (≤ 25, 25-26, 26-27, 27-28, 28-29, 29-30, > 30). The experimental group (A) used individualized injection rates (2.8-3.4 ml/s) with 350 mg I/ml contrast agent based on BMI, with a fixed injection time of 10s. The control group (B) used a fixed injection rate of 4.0 ml/s and a fixed injection time of 12s. Both groups employed prospective ECG-gated scanning. Image quality, effective radiation dose, and contrast agent dosage were compared using the Student's t-test. Results: In Group B, the coronary artery CT value exceeded the optimal diagnostic range (300-450 HU) recommended by experts. Group A had significantly lower CT values, SNR, and CNR compared to Group B (P < 0.05), but the enhancement in Group A was closer to the optimal diagnostic range. There was no significant difference in subjective image scores between the groups (P > 0.05), with consistent scoring between two directors (ICC: 0.612-0.852). Both groups had similar effective doses (P > 0.05). The contrast agent dosage in Group A was significantly lower than in Group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The optimized contrast injection scheme can significantly reduce the amount of contrast agent and obtain better image quality.